Link Area
  Home     Archives
'The Haunting in Connecticut' 29 March, 2009

'The Haunting in Connecticut'

Virginia Madsen is very concerned about the true nature of her new home in "The Haunting in Connecticut."

E-mail Picture
This film "based on a true story" is sort-of spooky and sort-of stupid.
By Mark Olsen
March 27, 2009
Billed as being "based on the true story," the sort-of spooky, sort-of stupid "The Haunting in Connecticut" follows a family who move into a rental home to put their cancer-stricken son closer to the clinic where he is receiv- ing experimental treatments. Caught between economic realities and difficult emotional truths, they stay put even after discovering that their new house was once a funeral home also used for rituals to speak with the dead.

Part of what makes " Connecticut" oddly watchable even as it drags is the oil-and-water mix of acting styles of the leads. Virginia Madsen's refined naturalism is an awkward fit with the sharp mannerisms of Martin Donovan, making them, as parents of the sick boy, unlikely scene partners and an even less likely married couple. As a cancer patient/reverend, only the creepy, chilly Elias Koteas -- who previously costarred with Madsen in the near-great B-movie "The Prophecy" -- finds a tone that works. The less said about wooden Kyle Gallner as the sick son, the better.

The film, from first-time feature director Peter Cornwell, seems most at ease when it is playing more like a domestic drama than a horror tale, with the rather unsettling implication early on that what is happening may be a hallucinatory side effect of the boy's trial cancer treatments. But "Haunting" suffers for its need to be sold as a straight-up horror film, and the fact it has been seemingly retrofitted as such. Cornwell never sees a mirror's reflection that doesn't deserve a shadowy figure in its background, or a dark corner that couldn't produce a moment of predictable shock.


As the movie is set in the pre-Internet 1980s, it does point to something more unique when it explores the interface between modern life, with its growing dependence on gadgets and gizmos and high-tech medical science, and what cultural critic Greil Marcus famously called "the old, weird America," that forgotten ancestral world of ghosts and seances, elixirs and the occasional box full of severed eyelids. And there is something downright charming when a character who is researching the history of the house goes to a (gasp!) library and uses microfilm.

Horror films are nothing if not bound by their conventions, and so it is always useful to point out new additions. Here's one: When the house you have newly rented has a dank, creepy basement with a mysterious door to a room of unknown purpose, do not -- I repeat, do not -- choose the basement as your bedroom. Likewise, if you discover your home was previously used for seances and necromancy, move out. Then again, these might not actually count as new horror rules, simply because simple common sense could lead you to these same conclusions, just as any sane person, horror fan or no, would do best to skip "The Haunting in Connecticut" for something else.

Posted by admin at 12:53 AM | View: (142)

Del.icio.us Technorati Furl Digg Blinklist Google Reddit Netvouz Add to Balatarin Send to Frinds by Y! Messenger
Search :
Last 30 posts:
Archives :
Monthly
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
Category


Copyright 2006 LinkArea.us , All Rights Reserved

LinkArea.Us